{"id":22514,"date":"2026-02-26T13:03:25","date_gmt":"2026-02-26T13:03:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514"},"modified":"2026-02-26T13:03:25","modified_gmt":"2026-02-26T13:03:25","slug":"wait-the-court-said-necessity-is-not-a-defense-the-justice-lecture-that-turned-the-trolley-problem-into-a-real-murder-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514","title":{"rendered":"\u201cWait\u2014the court said necessity is NOT a defense?\u201d The Justice Lecture That Turned the Trolley Problem Into a Real Murder Case"},"content":{"rendered":"

Professor Elliot Warren<\/strong> began the first lecture of \u201cJustice\u201d with a promise and a trap.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m not here to tell you what to think,\u201d he said, pacing in front of a packed auditorium. \u201cI\u2019m here to make you notice what you already believe\u2014especially when it gets uncomfortable.\u201d<\/p>\n

He clicked his remote and projected a simple drawing: a trolley on a track, five stick figures ahead, a switch leading to a side track with one person. \u201cYou\u2019re the driver,\u201d Elliot said. \u201cThe brakes fail. If you do nothing, five die. If you turn the wheel, one dies. What do you do?\u201d<\/p>\n

Hands shot up. Most students chose to steer\u2014sacrificing one to save five. Elliot nodded like he\u2019d expected it. \u201cSo,\u201d he said, \u201cyou\u2019re comfortable with a moral math problem. Outcomes matter.\u201d<\/p>\n

He changed the slide. Now it was a bridge. A trolley again, five workers again\u2014except this time there was no switch. A large man leaned over the railing beside a bystander.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou\u2019re the bystander,\u201d Elliot said. \u201cYou can push him onto the tracks. His body stops the trolley. Five live. He dies. Do you push?\u201d<\/p>\n

The room shifted. People laughed nervously. A few whispered, \u201cNo way.\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot didn\u2019t argue. He waited, letting the silence do the work. \u201cInteresting,\u201d he said. \u201cSame numbers. Different feeling. Why?\u201d<\/p>\n

A student in the front row, Maya Chen<\/strong>, spoke up. \u201cBecause in the first one, you redirect harm,\u201d she said. \u201cIn the second, you cause it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot smiled. \u201cIs that a real distinction,\u201d he asked, \u201cor a psychological one?\u201d<\/p>\n

He moved fast, layering dilemmas like weights. An ER doctor choosing between one critically injured patient and five moderately injured ones. Most students saved the five. Then he offered the transplant case: kill one healthy patient to harvest organs and save five dying people.<\/p>\n

The auditorium recoiled. Even students who\u2019d been confidently \u201cutilitarian\u201d a minute earlier refused. \u201cThat\u2019s murder,\u201d someone said. \u201cYou can\u2019t do that.\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot wrote two words on the board: OUTCOMES<\/strong> and DUTIES<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

\u201cNow we\u2019re cooking,\u201d he said. \u201cThe tension between consequentialist reasoning\u2014Bentham\u2019s style of maximizing welfare\u2014and categorical constraints\u2014Kant\u2019s style of treating persons as ends, not mere means.\u201d<\/p>\n

Then he pivoted from hypotheticals to a real case. \u201cIn 1884,\u201d he said, \u201ca yacht sank. Four men survived in a lifeboat. Weeks passed. Starvation set in. They killed the weakest\u2014an orphaned cabin boy\u2014and ate him. Three survived. In court, they argued necessity: one died so three could live.\u201d<\/p>\n

The room went quiet in a new way. This wasn\u2019t stick figures. This was a boy with a name and a pulse.<\/p>\n

Elliot underlined necessity<\/strong> on the board. \u201cThe question,\u201d he said, \u201cis whether necessity makes moral wrongs right.\u201d<\/p>\n

A student in the back muttered, \u201cWhat else could they do?\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot turned. \u201cExactly,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd now you\u2019re inside the problem.\u201d<\/p>\n

He closed his laptop halfway, like a judge about to speak a verdict. \u201cNext class,\u201d he said, \u201cwe won\u2019t start with philosophy. We\u2019ll start with the court\u2019s decision. And I want you to imagine being the judge\u2014because your answer will expose what you think justice is.\u201d<\/p>\n

As students stood to leave, Elliot added one last sentence, almost casual:<\/p>\n

\u201cBy the way\u2026 the court did not<\/strong> accept necessity.\u201d<\/p>\n

The room froze again.<\/p>\n

If necessity didn\u2019t excuse killing one to save three in real life, why do so many of us excuse killing one to save five in theory\u2014and what does that say about what we\u2019re really defending?<\/p>\n

Part 2<\/h2>\n

The next lecture began with the sound of paper.<\/p>\n

Professor Elliot Warren held up a photocopy of the 1884 decision\u2014Queen v. Dudley and Stephens\u2014like it was evidence in a trial. \u201cBefore we do any philosophy,\u201d he said, \u201cwe\u2019re going to do law.\u201d<\/p>\n

He summarized the facts without theatrics: shipwreck, lifeboat, starvation, a cabin boy named Richard Parker, a knife, a prayer, and then death. \u201cThey argued necessity,\u201d Elliot said, \u201cand the public sympathized. Many people felt: they had no choice.\u201d<\/p>\n

He wrote a sentence on the board: \u201cNecessity is not a defense to murder.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWhy would a court say that?\u201d he asked. \u201cIsn\u2019t law supposed to reflect common sense?\u201d<\/p>\n

Maya Chen raised her hand again. \u201cBecause if you allow necessity,\u201d she said, \u201cthen anyone can claim they \u2018had\u2019 to kill.\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot nodded. \u201cThe slippery slope argument,\u201d he said. \u201cBut there\u2019s more.\u201d<\/p>\n

He divided the room into groups and gave them roles: judge, prosecutor, defense attorney, and juror. Their assignment was to argue\u2014not what they personally felt, but what justice required. The room buzzed, and Elliot walked between rows like a referee.<\/p>\n

One group\u2019s \u201cdefense attorney,\u201d a student named Jordan Patel<\/strong>, argued pure outcome: \u201cThree lives saved. One life lost. Net gain. If we punish them, we punish survival itself.\u201d<\/p>\n

Another group\u2019s \u201cprosecutor,\u201d Sofia Reyes<\/strong>, pushed back: \u201cThey didn\u2019t draw lots. They chose the weakest. That means someone\u2019s vulnerability became his death sentence.\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot stopped at Sofia\u2019s row. \u201cNotice that,\u201d he said. \u201cChoice matters. Process matters. Not just outcome.\u201d<\/p>\n

Then he returned to the trolley. \u201cIn the driver case,\u201d he said, \u201cyou steer. In the bridge case, you refuse to push. In the transplant case, you refuse to harvest. Your intuitions suggest you accept tradeoffs sometimes but reject using a person as a tool.\u201d<\/p>\n

He wrote MEANS<\/strong> in big letters.<\/p>\n

\u201cBentham might say, \u2018What matters is happiness and suffering.\u2019 Kant might say, \u2018Some actions are wrong even if they produce good outcomes.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

A student asked, \u201cSo which one is right?\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot smiled. \u201cIf I answer that, you\u2019ll stop thinking. Instead, ask: what principle explains your judgments across cases?\u201d<\/p>\n

He made them test themselves. If you\u2019d divert the trolley, would you also push the man? If you\u2019d save five in the ER, why not in transplant? If you\u2019d punish shipwreck survivors, why excuse wartime decisions that sacrifice a few for many?<\/p>\n

The class grew uncomfortable, which Elliot treated as progress.<\/p>\n

Then he introduced the most unsettling point: \u201cYour moral reactions may be partly psychological,\u201d he said, \u201cshaped by distance, intention, and how direct the harm feels.\u201d<\/p>\n

He didn\u2019t say this to dismiss morality, but to complicate it. \u201cIf your conscience changes with framing,\u201d he asked, \u201cis your principle real\u2014or just preference wearing a moral costume?\u201d<\/p>\n

Near the end, Elliot told a story about an emergency dispatcher deciding which ambulance to send first. \u201cReal life doesn\u2019t pause for perfect principles,\u201d he said. \u201cBut law still has to draw lines.\u201d<\/p>\n

He returned to Dudley and Stephens. The court sentenced them, but later commuted their punishment. \u201cLaw affirmed a rule,\u201d he said, \u201cwhile mercy adjusted the outcome. That combination\u2014principle plus discretion\u2014is one way a society tries to be just.\u201d<\/p>\n

As students packed up, Maya stayed behind. \u201cProfessor,\u201d she said, \u201cI keep thinking about the cabin boy. People call him \u2018the weakest,\u2019 like that\u2019s his identity.\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot nodded slowly. \u201cThat\u2019s the danger,\u201d he said. \u201cOnce you label someone a \u2018means,\u2019 it becomes easier to treat them as one.\u201d<\/p>\n

He paused, then added a twist: \u201cNext time, we\u2019ll ask whether utilitarianism can protect the vulnerable better than Kant can. And we\u2019ll do it with modern cases\u2014triage, algorithms, and public policy.\u201d<\/p>\n

Maya blinked. \u201cSo this isn\u2019t just thought experiments.\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot\u2019s smile was small. \u201cIt never was.\u201d<\/p>\n

If justice is partly about rules and partly about mercy, where do we draw the line when real lives are on the scale?<\/p>\n

\n

Part 3<\/h2>\n

By the third lecture, the students stopped laughing nervously. They arrived braced, like people who knew the questions would follow them home.<\/p>\n

Professor Elliot Warren began with a confession. \u201cWhen you first heard the trolley problem,\u201d he said, \u201cmany of you treated it like a clever puzzle. But you\u2019re starting to see what it really is: a mirror.\u201d<\/p>\n

He projected three headlines\u2014modern versions of old dilemmas: hospital triage during shortages, algorithmic policing, disaster evacuations. \u201cThese are trolley problems with paperwork,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd the people on the tracks are not stick figures. They\u2019re neighbors.\u201d<\/p>\n

He asked the class to revisit their earlier votes. Many had changed their minds. Some had hardened theirs. Elliot didn\u2019t shame either group. He made them explain themselves.<\/p>\n

Maya spoke carefully. \u201cI still think outcomes matter,\u201d she said. \u201cBut I\u2019m scared of any system that treats certain people as acceptable losses.\u201d<\/p>\n

Elliot nodded. \u201cThat fear is rational,\u201d he said. \u201cUtilitarianism can become cruel if it ignores distribution\u2014who bears the costs and who enjoys the benefits.\u201d<\/p>\n

He introduced a key idea without jargon: if a policy maximizes total welfare but consistently harms the same vulnerable group, can it be called just? \u201cA society can\u2019t call itself fair,\u201d he said, \u201cif \u2018the few\u2019 are always the same people.\u201d<\/p>\n

Then he turned to Kant. \u201cKant\u2019s constraint\u2014never use persons merely as means\u2014sounds protective,\u201d Elliot said. \u201cBut it can also be rigid. In emergencies, rigid rules can produce preventable deaths.\u201d<\/p>\n

He made the class confront that tension honestly. The driver case, the bridge case, the transplant case\u2014each one forced them to decide what kind of moral agents they wanted to be when consequences and principles collided.<\/p>\n

Elliot ended with the most practical lesson of the course: \u201cJustice,\u201d he said, \u201cis not just a set of answers. It\u2019s a discipline of reasoning in public\u2014where you owe others an explanation they could accept even if they disagree.\u201d<\/p>\n

He asked them to practice that. Not just \u201cI feel,\u201d but \u201cI can defend.\u201d Not just \u201cIt\u2019s obvious,\u201d but \u201cHere\u2019s why.\u201d He reminded them that moral disagreement isn\u2019t always ignorance\u2014sometimes it\u2019s competing values.<\/p>\n

Before dismissing class, Elliot returned to the cabin boy. \u201cRichard Parker had no vote,\u201d he said. \u201cNo voice. And yet, his death became a case that shaped law for generations.\u201d<\/p>\n

He let that settle, then shifted to the present. \u201cYour choices\u2014what you support, what you tolerate, what you ignore\u2014shape who gets protected and who gets treated as disposable. That\u2019s why this course matters.\u201d<\/p>\n

Students filed out more slowly than before. Some looked thoughtful. Some looked unsettled. That, Elliot believed, was appropriate.<\/p>\n

Maya lingered at the door. \u201cSo what do we do with all this?\u201d she asked.<\/p>\n

Elliot didn\u2019t give her a slogan. \u201cStart small,\u201d he said. \u201cNotice who your \u2018math\u2019 forgets. Ask who pays. Ask who benefits. Then speak.\u201d<\/p>\n

And because Americans love conclusions, he gave them one line they could remember without simplifying the truth:<\/p>\n

\u201cJustice is what you build when you refuse to let the vulnerable disappear from the calculation.\u201d<\/p>\n

If this made you think, share it, comment your view, and debate kindly\u2014your reasoning shapes our world more than you realize.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Professor Elliot Warren began the first lecture of \u201cJustice\u201d with a promise and a trap. \u201cI\u2019m not here to tell you what to think,\u201d he said, pacing in front of a packed auditorium. \u201cI\u2019m here to make you notice what you already believe\u2014especially when it gets uncomfortable.\u201d He clicked his remote and projected a simple […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":22533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-purpose"],"yoast_head":"\n\u201cWait\u2014the court said necessity is NOT a defense?\u201d The Justice Lecture That Turned the Trolley Problem Into a Real Murder Case - Purposeful Days<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cWait\u2014the court said necessity is NOT a defense?\u201d The Justice Lecture That Turned the Trolley Problem Into a Real Murder Case - Purposeful Days\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Professor Elliot Warren began the first lecture of \u201cJustice\u201d with a promise and a trap. \u201cI\u2019m not here to tell you what to think,\u201d he said, pacing in front of a packed auditorium. \u201cI\u2019m here to make you notice what you already believe\u2014especially when it gets uncomfortable.\u201d He clicked his remote and projected a simple […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Purposeful Days\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-26T13:03:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/dreamina-2026-02-26-3260-Bo-chu-bo-logo-cac-ki-tu-mui-ten-va-vong._X-Design.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"450\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"purpose true\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"purpose true\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514\",\"name\":\"\u201cWait\u2014the court said necessity is NOT a defense?\u201d The Justice Lecture That Turned the Trolley Problem Into a Real Murder Case - Purposeful Days\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/dreamina-2026-02-26-3260-Bo-chu-bo-logo-cac-ki-tu-mui-ten-va-vong._X-Design.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-26T13:03:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8783f12fcf24b2f3203d550722d57e0a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/dreamina-2026-02-26-3260-Bo-chu-bo-logo-cac-ki-tu-mui-ten-va-vong._X-Design.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/dreamina-2026-02-26-3260-Bo-chu-bo-logo-cac-ki-tu-mui-ten-va-vong._X-Design.jpg\",\"width\":450,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cWait\u2014the court said necessity is NOT a defense?\u201d The Justice Lecture That Turned the Trolley Problem Into a Real Murder Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/\",\"name\":\"Purposeful Days\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8783f12fcf24b2f3203d550722d57e0a\",\"name\":\"purpose true\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/311b99b03b9df64c75e9364ec478f537fdeab67bf8add124c69fac49517fcec6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/311b99b03b9df64c75e9364ec478f537fdeab67bf8add124c69fac49517fcec6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"purpose true\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?author=4\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201cWait\u2014the court said necessity is NOT a defense?\u201d The Justice Lecture That Turned the Trolley Problem Into a Real Murder Case - Purposeful Days","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cWait\u2014the court said necessity is NOT a defense?\u201d The Justice Lecture That Turned the Trolley Problem Into a Real Murder Case - Purposeful Days","og_description":"Professor Elliot Warren began the first lecture of \u201cJustice\u201d with a promise and a trap. \u201cI\u2019m not here to tell you what to think,\u201d he said, pacing in front of a packed auditorium. \u201cI\u2019m here to make you notice what you already believe\u2014especially when it gets uncomfortable.\u201d He clicked his remote and projected a simple […]","og_url":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514","og_site_name":"Purposeful Days","article_published_time":"2026-02-26T13:03:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":450,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/dreamina-2026-02-26-3260-Bo-chu-bo-logo-cac-ki-tu-mui-ten-va-vong._X-Design.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"purpose true","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"purpose true","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514","url":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514","name":"\u201cWait\u2014the court said necessity is NOT a defense?\u201d The Justice Lecture That Turned the Trolley Problem Into a Real Murder Case - Purposeful Days","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/dreamina-2026-02-26-3260-Bo-chu-bo-logo-cac-ki-tu-mui-ten-va-vong._X-Design.jpg","datePublished":"2026-02-26T13:03:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8783f12fcf24b2f3203d550722d57e0a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/dreamina-2026-02-26-3260-Bo-chu-bo-logo-cac-ki-tu-mui-ten-va-vong._X-Design.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/dreamina-2026-02-26-3260-Bo-chu-bo-logo-cac-ki-tu-mui-ten-va-vong._X-Design.jpg","width":450,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?p=22514#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cWait\u2014the court said necessity is NOT a defense?\u201d The Justice Lecture That Turned the Trolley Problem Into a Real Murder Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/","name":"Purposeful Days","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8783f12fcf24b2f3203d550722d57e0a","name":"purpose true","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/311b99b03b9df64c75e9364ec478f537fdeab67bf8add124c69fac49517fcec6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/311b99b03b9df64c75e9364ec478f537fdeab67bf8add124c69fac49517fcec6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"purpose true"},"url":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/?author=4"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=22514"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22514\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22535,"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22514\/revisions\/22535"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/22533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=22514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=22514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/purpose.lifestruepurpose.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=22514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}