Hegseth Strikes Two Black and Two Female Officers From Promotion List<\/p>\n
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth\u2019s highly unusual decision to remove officers from a one-star promotion list has spurred allegations of racial and gender bias.<\/p>\n
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is blocking the promotion of four Army officers to be one-star generals, a highly unusual move that has prompted some senior military officials to question whether the officers are being singled out because of their race or gender.<\/p>\n
Two of the officers targeted by Mr. Hegseth are Black and two are women on a promotion list that consists of about three dozen officers, most of whom are white men, senior military officials said.<\/p>\n
Mr. Hegseth had been pressing senior Army leaders, including Army Secretary Daniel P. Driscoll, for months to remove the officers\u2019 names, military officials said. But Mr. Driscoll, citing the officers\u2019 decades-long records of exemplary service, had repeatedly refused.<\/p>\n
Earlier this month, Mr. Hegseth broke the logjam by unilaterally striking the officers\u2019 names from the list, though it is not clear he has the legal authority to do so. The list is currently being reviewed by the White House, which is expected to send it to the Senate for final approval. A few female and Black officers remain on the list, military officials said.<\/p>\n
It is exceedingly rare that a one-star list draws such intense scrutiny from a defense secretary. The battle highlights the bitter rifts opened by Mr. Hegseth\u2019s campaign to reverse policies that he says are prejudiced against white officers.<\/p>\n
Mr. Hegseth has said repeatedly that he is determined to change a culture corrupted by \u201cfoolish,\u201d \u201creckless\u201d and \u201cwoke\u201d leaders from previous administrations. But his heavy scrutiny, especially of female and minority officers, is eroding confidence in a promotion system that is supposed to be apolitical and merit based, his critics have said.<\/p>\n
This article is based on interviews with 11 current and former military and administration officials who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive personnel matters.<\/p>\n
The frustrations with Mr. Hegseth\u2019s approach came to a boil last summer during a heated exchange between Ricky Buria, Mr. Hegseth\u2019s chief of staff, and Mr. Driscoll about a separate promotion.<\/p>\n
Mr. Buria chastised the Army secretary for selecting Maj. Gen. Antoinette R. Gant, a combat engineer who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, to take command of the Military District of Washington, said three current and former defense and administration officials familiar with the exchange. The command provides security and performs ceremonial duties in the nation\u2019s capital, and its commander often appears alongside the president at Arlington National Cemetery.<\/p>\n
Mr. Buria told Mr. Driscoll that President Trump would not want to stand next to a Black female officer at military events, the officials said.<\/p>\n
Mr. Driscoll was shocked. \u201cThe president is not a racist or sexist,\u201d he told Mr. Buria, according to the officials. Mr. Driscoll then raised the issue with a senior White House official who agreed with his assessment of Mr. Trump.<\/p>\n
Mr. Hegseth\u2019s office retreated. General Gant began serving in the position last summer and was promoted to two-star rank earlier this month.<\/p>\n
Mr. Buria called the account of his interaction with Mr. Driscoll \u201ccompletely false.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhoever placed this made up story is clearly trying to sow division among our ranks in the department and the administration,\u201d he wrote in a text message. \u201cIt\u2019s not going to work, and it will never work when this department is led by clear-eyed, mission-driven leaders unfazed by fake Washington gossip.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Pentagon did not address Mr. Hegseth\u2019s decision to strike the four officers from the promotion list or respond to questions about Mr. Buria\u2019s interaction with Mr. Driscoll.<\/p>\n
\u201cUnder Secretary Hegseth, military promotions are given to those who have earned them,\u201d said Sean Parnell, the department\u2019s chief spokesman, in a statement. He defended the process as \u201capolitical and unbiased.\u201d<\/p>\n
The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, declined to discuss the list or Mr. Buria\u2019s reported remarks. But she praised Mr. Hegseth, saying he was \u201cdoing a tremendous job restoring meritocracy throughout the ranks at the Pentagon, as President Trump directed him to do.\u201d The Army declined to comment.<\/p>\n
Mr. Hegseth came to the Pentagon last year focused on undoing the work of former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his defense secretary, Lloyd J. Austin III, who pushed to diversify the military\u2019s top ranks, which had long been the domain of white men.<\/p>\n
Mr. Austin, a former four-star Army general, was the first African-American to serve as defense secretary. He and Mr. Biden selected Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. of the Air Force as the second African American to serve as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and they picked Adm. Lisa Franchetti to be the first woman to lead the Navy.<\/p>\n
Today, about 43 percent of the 1.3 million troops on active duty are people of color. But those leading the military are overwhelmingly white and male. Mr. Austin pressed promotion boards to look deeper into the ranks to ensure qualified women and minorities were considered for senior positions.<\/p>\n
In his 2024 book, \u201cThe War on Warriors,\u201d Mr. Hegseth disparaged many of the senior officers who rose up under Mr. Austin\u2019s tenure as \u201ccowards hiding under stars\u201d and \u201cwhores to wokesters.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Left captured the military quickly, and we must reclaim it at a faster pace,\u201d he wrote. \u201cWe must wage a frontal assault. A swift counterattack, in broad daylight.\u201d<\/p>\n
Since taking office, Mr. Hegseth has fired or sidelined at least two-dozen generals and admirals, including General Brown and Admiral Franchetti. Currently, the chairman and vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all five service chiefs and nine of the military\u2019s 10 combatant commanders are white men, a return to the status quo that existed for decades.<\/p>\n
Last summer, Mr. Hegseth signed off on a sweeping overhaul of how officers are selected for promotion and command. To lead the process, Mr. Hegseth tapped Anthony J. Tata, a retired brigadier general, who once called President Barack Obama a\u00a0\u201cterrorist leader\u201d\u00a0and whose history of Islamophobic comments prevented him from being confirmed to a senior Pentagon position in 2020. In 2025, Mr. Trump selected Mr. Tata to oversee personnel policy in the military.<\/p>\n
Mr. Tata has worked closely with former Marine Lt. Col. Stuart Scheller, who in 2021\u00a0pleaded\u00a0guilty to dereliction of duty for publicly excoriating senior military leaders who oversaw the bloody and chaotic retreat of U.S. forces from Afghanistan.<\/p>\n
Shortly after the two began their personnel overhaul, Mr. Hegseth ordered the Army to shutter a program that sought to ensure that all officers, regardless of race or gender, had a chance to compete for top jobs. The\u00a0Command Assessment Program, which began as a pilot during the first Trump administration, was later institutionalized under Mr. Biden\u2019s Army Secretary Christine Wormuth. It supplemented traditional personnel evaluations with peer reviews and double-blind interviews in which the identities of the candidate and interviewer are hidden.<\/p>\n
Mr. Tata and Mr. Scheller also began to review the officers on the military\u2019s one-star lists for Mr. Hegseth, military officials said. The officers on the Army\u2019s list were selected by a board of generals that met in November 2024. Only about 5 percent of eligible colonels become generals, making it the\u00a0most competitive\u00a0promotion in the Army.<\/p>\n
Mr. Hegseth and his aides ordered Mr. Driscoll to remove the four officers from the list.<\/p>\n
Those struck included a Black armor officer and combat veteran, who was singled out because he had written a paper nearly 15 years earlier that analyzed why African American officers historically have opted for support jobs over frontline, combat positions, military officials said.<\/p>\n
Military officials said a female logistics officer was targeted because she had served in Afghanistan during the bloody 2021 withdrawal. Current and former military officials said she performed her job well amid the chaos and intense pressure that followed the collapse of Afghanistan\u2019s government and security forces. Mr. Hegseth has blasted the operation as \u201cdisastrous and embarrassing\u201d and vowed to hold officers who took part in it to account.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s unclear why Mr. Hegseth removed the other two officers \u2014 another logistics officer and a finance specialist \u2014 from the list, military officials said.<\/p>\n
A fifth officer on the list,\u00a0Col. Dave Butler,\u00a0was the spokesman for Gen. Mark Milley, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff whom Mr. Trump loathes and has accused of disloyalty. Mr. Hegseth had repeatedly asked Mr. Driscoll to fire Colonel Butler. The Army officer resigned in February in the hope that his departure would convince Mr. Hegseth to send the list to the White House, military officials said. Colonel Butler is a white man.<\/p>\n
Senior officials in Mr. Hegseth\u2019s office have been debating for months whether Mr. Hegseth has the legal authority to strike names from a one-star list before he sends it to the White House, military officials said.<\/p>\n
In his role as defense secretary, Mr. Hegseth is supposed to review and approve the list. But to protect the military\u2019s officer corps from being politicized, he has only two options under military regulations, officials said. He can reject or accept the entire list.<\/p>\n
The last time a one-star list drew such intense scrutiny from a defense secretary was 2007, during the height of the Iraq War. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates had grown frustrated that the Army\u2019s one-star promotion boards were passing over the service\u2019s most innovative battlefield commanders.<\/p>\n
Fixing the problem was so important to Mr. Gates that he\u00a0summoned\u00a0Gen. David H. Petraeus, then the top commander in Iraq, back to Washington to oversee the board. At the time, military experts described Mr. Gates\u2019 decision to bring General Petraeus back from a crucial combat mission as unprecedented.<\/p>\n
Senior military officials said they could not recall any previous instance of a defense secretary seeking to remove individual officers from a military board\u2019s list.<\/p>\n
Until the one-star lists are approved by the Senate, the names are supposed to remain confidential. It is not clear if Mr. Hegseth or his aides have tried to remove officers from similar Navy, Air Force or Marine Corps lists.<\/p>\n
In his speech last September to several hundred officers at Marine Corps Base Quantico,\u00a0Mr. Hegseth\u00a0said that his work to remake the military\u2019s officer corps was just beginning.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe leaders who created the woke department have already driven out too many hard chargers,\u201d he said. \u201cWe reverse that trend right now.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Hegseth Strikes Two Black and Two Female Officers From Promotion List Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth\u2019s highly unusual decision to remove officers from a one-star promotion list has spurred allegations of racial and gender bias. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is blocking the promotion of four Army officers to be one-star generals, a highly unusual move that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":33642,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33641","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-purpose"],"yoast_head":"\n