“Your Honor, their dog jumped onto my hot tub and destroyed it — and now they refuse to pay despite knowing exactly what happened.”
The words cut cleanly across Judge Judy’s crowded courtroom.
Tina Mercer, a neatly dressed woman clutching printed repair invoices, stood at the plaintiff’s podium, glaring across the aisle at Derek Nolan, her longtime neighbor. Behind Derek sat his towering brindle Cane Corso, calm but alert, just outside the courtroom doors with a handler present.
Judge Judy lifted an eyebrow. “Dogs, a hot tub, and you want pain and suffering too? This should be interesting.”
Tina nodded eagerly. She described a meeting on June 22nd, when Derek brought his Cane Corso to her property to see if the dogs might be compatible for breeding. Tina owned a massive English Mastiff named Brutus. During the introduction, Brutus reportedly became overly excited, leaped up against the covered hot tub nearby, and moments later the cover collapsed inward with a loud snap.
“The dogs started circling, barking, stepping on everything,” Tina said. “I yelled for Derek to grab his dog, but he just stood there. Then the cover cracked. Water went everywhere.”
She claimed the damaged hot tub sat unusable for nearly four months, leaving her in pain because she relied on hydrotherapy for her chronic back condition.
Derek shook his head forcefully.
“Your Honor, that never happened the way she describes. My dog never stepped near that hot tub. And I didn’t even come to her house that week.”
Judge Judy turned sharply. “So you’re saying there was no visit at all?”
“That’s correct,” Derek answered.
Tina immediately shot back. “That’s not true! He was there with the Corso. He brought the dog to test for breeding compatibility.”
Derek smirked. “They never met. My dog’s not even fully grown — 95 pounds, nowhere near jumping on a spa cover.”
Judge Judy studied Derek evenly. “Ninety-five pounds jumping is still ninety-five pounds landing. Don’t play physics with me.”
She flipped through the documents Tina presented — repair quotes totaling $812 for replacing the spa cover — along with unreadable blurred phone screenshots allegedly showing a meetup arrangement.
Judge Judy frowned.
“These texts don’t show addresses, times, or confirmation of any incident.”
Tina stiffened.
“There were witnesses,” she insisted. “Another neighbor saw the dogs.”
Judge Judy paused.
“Witnesses have a way of changing things — IF they exist.”
She leaned forward.
“Before I decide anything, I need confirmation of who was actually where on June 22nd.”
She turned to Derek.
“Are you willing to show location data from your phone for that date?”
Derek hesitated for a fraction of a second.
“Yes… I can provide it.”
But would Derek’s location data expose the truth — or open an even bigger mystery? And what would the neighbor witness reveal in Part 2?
Two weeks later, every seat in Judge Judy’s courtroom was filled again.
Judge Judy motioned sharply at Derek. “Show me your phone data.”
His attorney passed over printed GPS logs from the cell provider. Derek claimed the location records proved he had spent June 22nd at work across town.
Tina leaned in anxiously.
Judge Judy inspected the paperwork carefully — then laughed dryly.
“These records are from afternoon to evening only. The reported incident happened late morning.”
Tina’s eyes widened.
“Exactly, your Honor — it happened around 10:30 a.m..”
Judge Judy squinted. “Your logs begin at 12:03 p.m. Where were you before that, Mr. Nolan?”
Derek hesitated. “I… left my phone at home that morning.”
Judge Judy stared him down.
“You conveniently left it behind the one time it matters?”
The courtroom murmured.
Next came the neighbor witness — Sandra Park, who lived directly behind Tina’s fence line.
Sandra testified steadily. “I was in my garden when I heard loud barking. I looked over and saw two huge dogs near the spa. One dog jumped with its front paws onto the cover — I heard cracking.”
Judge Judy leaned forward. “Which dog jumped?”
Sandra said firmly, “The brindle Cane Corso — his dog.”
Derek’s face drained of color.
Sandra continued, “Mr. Nolan was standing nearby, calling the dog, but he didn’t grab its leash until after the damage happened.”
Judge Judy turned sharply to Derek.
“You said your dog wasn’t there.”
“Well— I mean— the dog went over briefly but never jumped on anything—”
“Oh stop,” Judge Judy snapped. “Now you’re revising your story.”
She turned to Tina.
“Did you ask him to pay that day?”
“Yes — he said he’d ‘look into it’ and never returned another call.”
Judge Judy examined the spa repair estimates, nodding slowly.
“No medical documentation exists to support personal injury claims, so pain and suffering is dismissed.”
Tina nodded disappointed but relieved.
“But,” Judge Judy continued, “your property damage claim is legitimate and corroborated by your witness.“
She turned back to Derek.
“You allowed your dog onto someone else’s property during a nonessential meeting. You failed to restrain a powerful animal. And your story today was — frankly — unreliable.”
Gavel tap.
Judgment: $812 to Tina Mercer for spa cover replacement.
Derek exhaled heavily.
Judge Judy remained firm.
“This courtroom is not about dog mating experiments. It’s about responsibility.”
Outside court, Derek avoided Tina’s gaze — until she approached him calmly.
“I never wanted to fight,” she said quietly. “I just wanted you to take responsibility.”
He nodded slowly.
“I guess I should have done that.”
Three months later, the tension that once clung to both households had faded.
Tina’s spa gleamed with a brand-new reinforced vinyl cover — the damage fully repaired and paid off. More importantly, the dog tension eased as well.
Derek quietly reimbursed the judgment without delay and even delivered the check in person.
“I’m sorry I fought this for so long,” he told Tina. “I let stubbornness win over honesty.”
She accepted the apology with guarded gratitude.
Both neighbors had implemented strict dog-training protocols — reinforced leashes, obedience classes, and strict boundaries.
Their dogs no longer met unsupervised.
One Saturday afternoon, as Tina eased into the warm spa water for the first time since the fiasco, she laughed softly at the absurdity of it all.
“All that drama over dogs,” she murmured.
Across the fence, Derek nodded sheepishly.
“Not our proudest chapter.”
They both laughed.
The experience changed Derek as well. He volunteered at a canine training center and began mentoring first-time large-dog owners — emphasizing restraint, supervision, and legal responsibility.
Judge Judy’s words rang in his ears:
“Love your dog — but don’t forget the world has laws.”
Meanwhile, Tina let go of resentment, focusing back on her health and therapy routines. The months of stress had taught her to document everything — something she joked should be covered in school curriculums: Life Skills 101 — Always Keep Receipts.
Eventually, the neighbors became civil again — exchanging nods and brief greetings.
They’d learned something unusual but valuable:
Sometimes justice doesn’t just repair a broken object — it repairs behavior.
And while the dogs never became a breeding match, everyone involved gained something unexpected:
-
Accountability
-
Resolution
-
And a renewed dose of neighborly peace
No enemies left — only two pet owners much wiser than when they first walked into court.
